Friday, May 22, 2015

Who are the WHO & CDC Working for?

Rich donors are undermining WHO, say civil society groups

Can CDC in the US takings millions from pharma industry be unbiased?

How food, beverage giants influence WHO rules


Sunday, May 17, 2015

25 Points Questioning Vaccines - With Mainstream Links

Why Are We Still Vaccinating? 25 Questions From A Former Pro-Vaccine Advocate

 by -
BSIP/UIG via Getty Images

BSIP/UIG via Getty Images
I used to be pro vaccine.  I know the feeling of thinking others were just plain crazy and wrong for not vaccinating their children and themselves.  ‘Irresponsible!’ I said when pointing my finger.  I’d use the same old arguments about polio and small pox and how vaccines saved us from all those horrible diseases and just swallowing and regurgitating the propaganda I was brought up with.  It was only recently, in 2009 that I started questioning my long held beliefs and began digging in to the history, efficacy and safety of vaccines.  I was appalled at what I found and the recklessness of those government health agencies entrusted with our health and our children’s safety, and angry with myself that I had put my family’s health at risk by blind faith in others when I was ultimately responsible for the medical decisions of my family.
When I began to put this article together I specifically chose not to include research from or links to websites that are considered untrustworthy by most pro-vaxxers, sites such as Natural News, Mercola, etc. even though I personally trust those sites and much more than I would WebMd and for good reason [a].  Instead I chose to employ basic logic and also incorporate independent and .gov scientific studies-mostly peer review, journals, news from mainstream sources (that pro-vaxxers love and totally trust) and articles that link to other .gov scientific studies, as well as government statistical resources.  So, I started writing down questions and then looking for answers. I’ll admit, some of these questions have already been asked by others, but I just expanded upon it to form a helpful list.
I hope the following information helps you in your lifelong journey in search of health, vitality and truth in your own lives and your children’s lives.
1. Why are newborn babies vaccinated on their first day of life against a disease that is primarily transmitted sexually and by needles in drug users?
(Pregnant women are already tested for STD’s prior to birth so there’s no reason to give it to an infant). Interesting to note, of the few vaccines that still are given to infants and STILL has thimerasol in it is Hep B and DipTet (and Flu shot recommended to pregnant women).  So, the claim that it has been removed from all vaccines is a lie and misdirection. If they give it to all newborns then ALL the newborns are getting that thimerasol (mercury derivative).  “It was removed from many child vaccines in 2002 but remains in some vaccines (e.g., hepatitis B virus and)” Page 21.
2. Why are babies given vaccines to produce antibodies when they do not produce antibodies until after the age of 3 to 6 months?
They get the required antibodies from breastfeeding.
3. Why does the government tell parents to delay breast feeding and get more vaccines when breast feeding babies produce higher levels of antibodies?
4. Why aren’t vaccine manufacturers held responsible when their product injures your child? Why would these companies need to be protected from the effects of such wonderful products?
(Look into Vaccine Injury Compensation Program .gov and VAERS)
The Supreme Court ruling exempting the vaccine manufacturers from all liability is done under the explicit understanding that they fall under the category “unavoidably unsafe products.”
5. Why have no double blind, placebo, randomized controlled trials been done on any vaccines?
This is standard with any other drug.
6. Why are we following the US vaccination schedule? We are the most vaccinated population on the planet with the highest rates of infant deaths/SIDS in the western world?
7. Why are disease outbreaks occurring in populations with 90%+ vaccination rates? What about that ‘Herd Immunity’ guys?
8. Why are children vaccinated against these diseases still catching and spreading them? Johns Hopkins paper)
9. Why are we frightened of non-fatal illnesses that train a child’s immune system how to behave?
10. Why are vaccine manufacturers allowed to reduce antigens and insert cheap and toxic additives that aggravate the injection site?
11. Why do we need multi-dose vaccines if the number ONE priority of vaccine manufacturers is your child’s safety?
12. Why will no physician sign a written guarantee for a child’s safety prior to vaccinating them with products they insist you take and that they say are completely safe?
13. Why is there no outrage about the 3.1 billion dollars paid out in vaccine injury/death claims and yet they claim there is no correlation and they are perfectly safe?
14. Why don’t people recognize from history that the most widespread and lethal diseases in the last 200 years were reduced due to cleaner drinking water, improved sanitation, nutrition, less overcrowded areas and better living conditions? 
Vaccines were introduced at points in time where every single disease was already declining, most almost completely gone. To give vaccines credit for global reductions in disease is like giving a band-aid credit for healing a wound that was already closing. Dr. Hans Rosling shows exactly how the health condition of nearly all countries of the world have improved with wealth, even 200 years ago, at the times where there no vaccines. (blog yes, but the links are amazing and historical data.)
By the late 1950s, even before the introduction of measles vaccine, measles-related deaths and case fatality rates in the United States had decreased markedly, presumably as a result of improvement in health care and nutrition (Oxford Journal of Infectious Diseases).
Image Source
Image Source
15. Why do people keep parroting what they hear about ‘Herd Immunity?’
Herd immunity is a hilarious concept that assumes that 1) Vaccinated people are immune to the diseases for which they’ve been vaccinated, 2) Can not carry the diseases for which they are vaccinated/immune, 3) Because most of the people are vaccinated, other people around them can’t catch the disease. My favourite analogy for herd immunity is that if 95% of people in a building are wearing hard hats when the ceiling falls in, the 5% are protected. (credit Dr. Robert Murdoch)
16. Why are almost all pro-vaxxer adults we talk to not up to date on their adult vaccinations/boosters?
17. Why do pro-vaxxers ignore .gov scientific studies?
18. Why didn’t our government health agencies ever safety test thimerasol (a mercury derivative and adjuvant) since Lilly developed it in the 1920’s?
They used it in vaccines from 1930 to 2004! It still is in some vaccines such as the flu vaccine and others. Here is a 2 minute clip, from Congressional Hearings. The EPA themselves acknowledge the toxic effects of mercury:
19. Why is it that only 40% of health professionals receive the flu shot each year?  They must not believe in it.
20. Why? Instead of a mandatory vaccine law, why don’t they have a mandatory law passed to protect us from Iatrogenic Death? (Death by Doctor, 3rd leading cause of death!) Why doesn’t the pro vaccination public admit that the vaccinated spread disease and stop blaming us?
22. Why do people still trust their government health agencies when they say vaccines are perfectly safe? 
With all the big pharma fraud cases, Merck, Glaxo Smith Kline, etc. and all the class action suits that come out several times a year for death/injury you see on tv commercials every week, combine that with the VICP and VAERS .gov statistics, and Iatrogenic Death statistics, why do people still trust their government health agencies when they say vaccines are perfectly safe? Having said that, why is government trusted at all since Democide statistics (death by government) show that nearly 300 million in this last century were killed by the state. Those are non-combatants.
University of Hawaii Study:
23. Why do they put aborted fetal cells in Vaccines?  Also DNA from monkeys, chickens, human tumour cells?
24. Why is Aluminum being used as an adjuvant in vaccines when there are many .gov studies against it’s use as Toxic? (Go to Section 1.2. The Toxic Effects of Aluminum as a Vaccine Adjuvant.  One of many aluminum studies)
25. Why do people think the government can’t get away with secret human testing of disease, drugs, and chemicals on us when they have done it and apologized for it numerous times?
When they put toxic ingredients in vaccines, food, drugs, water and our sky that have no long term safety studies by any government health agency, that is tantamount to human experimentation. It’s a crime under the Geneva Convention, Nuremberg Code and our own constitution, and against medical informed consent laws.
Al Gore admits government experimentation
Bill Clinton apology for secret human experimentation
• (government study admitting experimentation of large populaces with aerosol vaccines)
Here’s a few more studies:
• Abnormal measles-mumps-rubella antibodies and CNS autoimmunity in children with autism.
“Autoimmunity to the central nervous system (CNS), especially to myelin basic protein (MBP), may play a causal role in autism, a neurodevelopmental disorder. Because many autistic children harbor elevated levels of measles antibodies, we conducted a serological study of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and MBP autoantibodies.
….over 90% of MMR antibody-positive autistic sera were also positive for MBP autoantibodies, suggesting a strong association between MMR and CNS autoimmunity in autism. Stemming from this evidence, we suggest that an inappropriate antibody response to MMR, specifically the measles component thereof, might be related to pathogenesis of autism.”
• Serological association of measles virus and human herpes virus-6
with brain auto-antibodies in autism.
This study is the first to report an association between virus serology and brain auto antibody in autism; it supports the hypothesis that a virus-induced autoimmune response may play a causal role in autism.
• Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum disorders
“Conjugate vaccines fundamentally change the manner in which the immune systems of infants and young children function by deviating their immune responses to the targeted carbohydrate antigens from a state of hypo-responsiveness to a robust B2 B cell mediated response.
This period of hypo-responsiveness to carbohydrate antigens coincides with the intense myelination process in infants and young children, and conjugate vaccines may have disrupted evolutionary forces that favoured early brain development over the need to protect infants and young children from capsular bacteria.”
• Effects of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis or tetanus vaccination on allergies and allergy-related respiratory symptoms among children and adolescents in the United States.
“The odds of having a history of asthma was twice as great among vaccinated subjects than among unvaccinated subjects. The odds of having had any allergy-related respiratory symptom in the past 12 months was 63% greater among vaccinated subjects than unvaccinated subjects. The associations between vaccination and subsequent allergies and symptoms were greatest among children aged 5 through 10 years.”
• Neurological Complications of Pertussis Immunization
Review is made of 107 cases of neurological complications of pertussis inoculation reported in the literature. The early onset of neurological symptoms was characteristic, with changes of consciousness and convulsions as the most striking features. The question of aetiology is considered and contraindications are discussed….as is the grave danger of further inoculations when a previous one has produced any suggestion of a neurological reaction.
• Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002.
“Findings suggest that U.S. male neonates vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1999 (from vaccination record) had a threefold higher risk for parental report of autism diagnosis compared to boys not vaccinated as neonates during that same time period. Nonwhite boys bore a greater risk.”
• Immunological findings in autism.
“The immunopathogenesis of autism is presented schematically in Fig. 1. Two main immune dysfunctions in autism are immune regulation involving pro-inflammatory cytokines and autoimmunity. Mercury and an infectious agent like the measles virus are currently two main candidate environmental triggers for immune dysfunction in autism.”
Aluminum Studies:

• Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?
“Our results show that: (i) children from countries with the highest ASD prevalence appear to have the highest exposure to Al from vaccines; (ii) the increase in exposure to Al adjuvants significantly correlates with the increase in ASD prevalence in the United States observed over the last two decades; and (iii) a significant correlation exists between the amounts of Al administered to preschool children and the current prevalence of ASD in seven Western countries, particularly at 3-4 months of age.”
• Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration.
“…A second series of experiments was conducted on mice injected with six doses of aluminum hydroxide. Behavioural analyses in these mice revealed significant impairments in a number of motor functions as well as diminished spatial memory capacity.”
Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?
Experimental research, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.  click for entire study
Aluminum-Induced Entropy in Biological Systems: Implications for Neurological Disease.
• Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populations.
• Aluminum adjuvant linked to Gulf War illness induces motor neuron death in mice.
The findings suggest a possible role for the aluminum adjuvant in some neurological features associated with GWI and possibly an additional role for the combination of adjuvants (Synergistic Toxicity).
• Aluminum in the central nervous system (CNS): toxicity in humans and animals, vaccine adjuvants, and autoimmunity.
• Biopersistence and brain translocation of aluminum adjuvants of vaccines.

“We previously showed that poorly biodegradable aluminum-coated particles injected into muscle are promptly phagocytosed in muscle and the draining lymph nodes, and can disseminate within phagocytic cells throughout the body and slowly accumulate in brain. This strongly suggests that long-term adjuvant biopersistence within phagocytic cells is a prerequisite for slow brain translocation and delayed neurotoxicity.”
• Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (Shoenfeld’s syndrome): clinical and immunological spectrum.
“The activation of the immune system by adjuvants, a desirable effect, could trigger manifestations of autoimmunity or autoimmune disease. Recently, a new syndrome was introduced, autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA), that includes postvaccination phenomena, macrophagic myofasciitis, Gulf War syndrome and siliconosis. This syndrome is characterized by nonspecific and specific manifestations of autoimmune disease. The main substances associated with ASIA are squalene (Gulf War syndrome), aluminum hydroxide (postvaccination phenomena, macrophagic myofasciitis) and silicone with siliconosis. Mineral oil, guaiacol and iodine gadital are also associated with ASIA.”
• Long-term Persistence of Vaccine-Derived Aluminum Hydroxide is Associated with Chronic Cognitive Dysfunction.
• Long-term follow-up of cognitive dysfunction in patients with aluminum hydroxideinduced macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF).
Thimerosal studies:
• Integrating experimental (in vitro and in vivo) neurotoxicity studies of low-dose thimerosal relevant to vaccines.
There is a need to interpret neurotoxic studies to help deal with uncertainties surrounding pregnant mothers, newborns and young children who must receive repeated doses of Thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCVs).
Information extracted from studies indicates that: (a) activity of low doses of Thimerosal against isolated human and animal brain cells was found in all studies and is consistent with Hg neurotoxicity; (b) the neurotoxic effect of ethylmercury has not been studied with co-occurring adjuvant-Al in TCVs; (c) animal studies have shown that exposure to Thimerosal-Hg can lead to accumulation of inorganic Hg in brain, and that (d) doses relevant to TCV exposure possess the potential to affect human neuro-development.
• Neurodevelopmental disorders following thimerosal-containing childhood immunizations: a follow-up analysis.
“The present study provides additional epidemiological evidence supporting previous epidemiological, clinical and experimental evidence that administration of thimerosal-containing vaccines in the United States resulted in a significant number of children developing NDs.”
• Neonatal administration of thimerosal causes persistent changes in mu opioid receptors in the rat brain.
“These data document that exposure to thimerosal during early postnatal life produces lasting alterations in the densities of brain opioid receptors along with other neuropathological changes, which may disturb brain development.”
• Persistent behavioural impairments and alterations of brain dopamine system after early postnatal administration of thimerosal in rats.
“These data document that early postnatal THIM administration causes lasting neurobehavioral impairments and neurochemical alterations in the brain, dependent on dose and sex. If similar changes occur in THIM/mercurial-exposed children, they could contribute do neurodevelopmental disorders.”
• Maternal Thimerosal Exposure Results in Aberrant Cerebellar Oxidative Stress, Thyroid Hormone Metabolism, and Motor Behaviour in Rat Pups; Sex- and Strain-Dependent Effects.
“Thimerisol exposure also resulted in a significant increase in cerebellar levels of the oxidative stress marker 3-nitrotyrosine… This coincided with an increased (47.0%) expression of a gene negatively regulated by T3… Our data thus demonstrate a negative neurodevelopmental impact of perinatal thimerisol exposure.”
• Administration of thimerosal to infant rats increases overflow of glutamate and aspartate in the prefrontal cortex: protective role of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate.
Thimerosal, a mercury-containing vaccine preservative, is a suspected factor in the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorders. We previously showed that its administration to infant rats causes behavioral, neurochemical and neuropathological abnormalities similar to those present in autism.
Flu Vaccine during Pregnancy:
Influenza Vaccination during Pregnancy.
The ACIP’s recommendation of influenza vaccination during pregnancy is not supported by citations in its own policy paper or in current medical literature. Considering the potential risks of maternal and fetal mercury exposure, the administration of thimerosal during pregnancy is both unjustified and unwise. Also, take note of the 71 references at the end of this study.
91 Peer Review Studies on The Dangers of Vaccines:

Methodological Issues and Evidence of Malfeasance in Research Purporting to Show Thimerosal in Vaccines Is Safe.

Research below represents under-reported, minimized and otherwise overlooked peer-reviewed data on adverse effects associated with vaccination.

• Neurologic adverse events following vaccination.


Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Everything You Wanted to Know About Andy Wakefield's Unjust Persecution

Dr Andrew Wakefield - MMR Vaccine - Truth and Reality

VRM: Dr. Wakefield’s Imminent Vindication – Turning Of The Tide

Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 Study demonstrated “anti-myelin antibodies and digestive tract pathologies” in children with autism after being given the Urabe strain triple live virus MMR vaccine. All 12 children in the Study had intestinal abnormalities (known as Inflammatory Bowel Disease), with chronic inflammation in the colon in 11 of the children. Noted behavioral disorders included autism in 9, disintegrative psychosis in 1, and possible post-viral or vaccinal encephalitis (acute brain inflammation) in 2.   

Since that release there have been countless other studies verifying exactly the same pattern – including the presence of measles lingering in the bowels of young children who have gotten of the Measles-Mumps-Rubella shot (MMR).

The Urabe strain MMR vaccine purchased by GlaxoSmitheKline for distribution in the UK, a triple live virus version, was directly responsible for an sudden spike in childhood Meningitis in the UK. It had been banned from use in Canada & was warned against further use in Britain by Canadian specialists. This was all suppressed by GSK & The British Gov’t. They are solely to blame for this crisis.

Note: ‘Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccines containing the Urabe strain of mumps were withdrawn in the United Kingdom in 1992 following demonstration of an increased risk of aseptic meningitis 15–35 days after vaccination.…A total of 894 children (in the UK) were admitted to a hospital in the second year of life with febrile convulsion, or convulsion not otherwise specified, between January 1998 and June 2002 and had a linked MMR vaccination record. These children had a total of 988 convulsion episodes (819 had one episode, 60 had two, 12 had three, two had four, and one had five).‘ American Journal of Epidemiology    
Contrary to CNN, it was this groundswell of parents who began to reject the MMR shot – because they saw that it was clearly implicated in Inflammatory Bowel Disease & the sudden appearance of early onset Autism in many of these children. The stigma around the MMR shot wasn’t Wakefield’s fault in the least. He just supplied parents with the knowledge, did what any sensible doctor should do in his position; thus clarifying what “informed consent” is supposed to provide for parents in the first place – safety.

Read more:

BREAKING NEWS: In the midst of Rupert Murdoch scandal, newly surfaced evidence points to a widespread Vaccine Industry-Media-Gov’t “hand-in-glove team effort” strategy to discredit Dr. Andrew Wakefield & vilify his findings -

1. Rupert Murdoch’s son James Murdoch sits on the board of GlaxoSmithKline.

2. “Investigative journalist” Brian Deer researched his case with the help of Medico-Legal Investigations, a private enquiry company whose only source of funding is the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry.

3. The head of Reuters serves on the Board of Merck, and Dr. Miriam Stoppard, “Daily Health Advisor” who writes at the Daily Mirror newspaper is married to Sir Christopher Hogg, who was Chairman of GlaxoSmithKline in 2004.

Read more:

Research References, (endless)

Dr Andrew Wakefield Defends His Research, (a quite lengthy video, but puts the TRUTH front and center, all of it).

The Legacy of Vaccine Injury - Dr. Andrew Wakefield (a complete expose on as well the issue regarding the lack of vacine safety and effectiveness in general. This is one of the best vaccine truth exposes, ever.)

Is that evidence enough of and for those MMR vaccine lost children, and as to what the causation actually has been?

Vaccine Safety Conference Session 15 Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Selective Hearing: Brian Deer and the GMC

Or here.

Research References, (endless)

Dr. Andrew Wakefield's rebuttal to Brian Deer's article in the BMJ (British Medical Journal)

New Published Study Verifies Andrew Wakefield’s Research on Autism – Again (MMR Vaccine Causes Autism)    vaccine-causes-autism/

The Current Failure of Pertussis and Measles Vaccine

The Question That Brian Deer and Dorit Reiss Cannot Answer

Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield
(Why are So Many Important Safety Studies Being Ignored?)

Banned Wakefield Films From British TV Emerge on Youtube After Nearly a Decade

Hear The Silence (2003) Dr Andrew Wakefield Drama

New evidence 'shows MMR link to autism'
UPDATED: 01:48 EST, 9 August 2002

Dr. Andrew Wakefield ~ BREAKING NEWS ~ MMR Vaccine / Autism Link (same as video above)

Callous Disregard

Selective Hearing - The documentary about Brian Deer, vaccines and autism (same as video above)
New Study Shows Link Between MMR Vaccine and Autism

The Link between the MMR Vaccine and Autism

New evidence 'shows MMR link to autism'

Vaccine court' awards millions to two autistic children damaged by vaccines

Italian court reignites MMR vaccine debate after award over child with autism

Abnormal Measles-Mumps-Rubella Antibodies and CNS Autoimmunity in Children with Autism
by Vijendra K. Singh, Sheren X. Lin, Elizabeth Newell, Courtney Nelson
Department of Biology and Biotechnology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA

The full article is available in PDF format: Abnormal Measles-Mumps-Rubella Antibodies and CNS Autoimmunity in Children with Autism [132 KB PDF]

Abnormal Measles-Mumps-Rubella Antibodies and CNS Autoimmunity in Children with Autism

Autoimmunity to the central nervous system (CNS), especially to myelin basic protein (MBP), may play a causal role in autism, a neurodevelopmental disorder. Because many autistic children harbor elevated levels of measles antibodies, we conducted a serological study of measlesmumps-rubella (MMR) and MBP autoantibodies. Using serum samples of 125 autistic children and 92 control children, antibodies were assayed by ELISA or immunoblotting methods. ELISA analysis showed a significant increase in the level of MMR antibodies in autistic children. Immunoblotting analysis revealed the presence of an unusual MMR antibody in 75 of 125 (60%) autistic sera but not in control sera. This antibody specifically detected a protein of 73–75 kD of MMR. This protein band, as analyzed with monoclonal antibodies, was immunopositive for measles hemagglutinin (HA) protein but not for measles nucleoprotein and rubella or mumps viral proteins. Thus the MMR antibody in autistic sera detected measles HA protein, which is unique to the measles subunit of the vaccine. Furthermore, over 90% of MMR antibody-positive autistic sera were also positive for MBP autoantibodies, suggesting a strong association between MMR and CNS autoimmunity in autism. Stemming from this evidence, we suggest that an inappropriate antibody response to MMR, specifically the measles component thereof, might be related to pathogenesis of autism.

Vijendra K. Singh, Ph.D.
Research Associate Professor of Neuroimmunology
Department of Biology, Center for Integrated Biosystems
Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA

Also see the Biomedical Treatment - page. If it is not the vaccines, then recovery by the means they are doing it, would not be possible. Detoxing the vaccines, and healing the harm done; and guess what, recovery happens.

The Vindication of Dr Andrew Wakefield

The data in question was the pathology reports that showed gastointestinal disease. Wakefield was not in charge of evaluating the pathology reports in this paper that was the charge of Dr. John O' Leary an independent Dublin pathologist. Dr. O'Leary stands by his reports, and they are not challenged by the UK's General Medical Council (GMC).

The UK General Medical Council charged Wakefield with serious professional misconduct and sanction, Wakefield was found guilty by the GMC (General Medical Council, pg. 7 & 9).

Professor Walker-Smith was also charged with and found guilty of serious professional misconduct and sanction, just as Wakefield. The description of the charges were similar with one variation being the monies given to Wakefield via the Legal Aid Board (LAB). On appeal all of the GMC's rulings toward Walker-Smith were overturned. the UK High Court's Mr. Justice Mitting criticized the U.K. General Medical Council, stating its judgment had been "based on inadequate and superficial reasoning" (High Court Of Justice, 2010). The claims of the BMC were deemed false to which they did not appeal this decision.;_ylu=X3oDMTEzYzhwdmNsBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMwRjb2xvA2dxMQR2dGlkA1ZJUDM1MV8x/SIG=12l1o1f5l/EXP=1389355464/**http%3a//

MMR-Danish Study - a critical analysis ---Ulf BrĂ¥nell

Vaccines and Autism - What Do Epidemiological Studies Really Tell Us?

There are 16 epidemiological studies here on MMR vaccines, thimerosal and autism. These studies represent the most often cited papers by scientists, public health officials and members of the media when trying to refute any evidence of an association between vaccinations and autism.

There are serious methodological limitations, design flaws, conflicts of interest or other problems related to each of these 16 studies. These flaws have been pointed out by government officials, other researchers, medical review panels and even the authors of the studies themselves. Taken together, the limitations of these studies make it impossible to conclude that thimerosal and MMR vaccines are not associated with autism.

The Fallacy of Thimerosal Removal & Autism Increase: A Failure of Science, A Bigger Failure to Children Worldwide

Readers of Age of Autism are aware of the term “the big hungry lie” coined by regular contributor J.B. Handley, used to describe the tactics of the CDC and the drug industry’s attempts to disassociate autism from vaccines in any way, shape, or form.

Perhaps the biggest lie of all is the one that has been repeated all too long, that after thimerosal was reduced or eliminated from vaccines, autism rates continued to go up. There have been multiple instances of this claim and each time it has been proven false, right up to the recent lie that after thimerosal was removed from vaccines in 2001, autism rates continue to increase. (An analysis of the studies)

Read more:

Chapter V: 2003
It's Rotten in Denmark, (a set of unbiased analysis of the CDC fundded Thimerosal epidemiological study)

Vaccine Safety Evidence Not Supported by Science

Is Vaccine Safety Evidence “Rock Solid”?

For the entire article please visit:
In spite of the widespread notion that vaccines are largely safe and serious adverse complications are extremely rare, a close scrutiny of the scientific literature does not support this view [10-12]. Indeed, it is often assumed that vaccines face a tougher safety standard than most pharmaceutical products. However, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) transcript of the 2002 Worksop on non-clinical safety evaluation of preventative vaccines: recent advances and regulatory considerations [1]:
“Historically, the non-clinical safety assessment for preventive vaccines has often not included toxicity studies in animal models. This is because vaccines have not been viewed as inherently toxic”
[emphasis In contrast to most drugs and biological products that are predominantly developed to treat ill patients, vaccines primarily are given to large numbers of healthy people, oftentimes predominantly healthy infants and children. And this places significant emphasis on their safety.
This is a startling admission from an Agency which according to its own mission statement is ”responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs” [17]. Essentially, what the FDA workshop [1] revealed is that not only are vaccines not adequately evaluated for toxicity but also, that the reason for such an oversight rested on a belief rather than scientific evidence. Moreover, it is mind-boggling that inadequately tested products on whose safety FDA “places significant emphasis” are actually licensed by the same Agency for mass use.
Furthermore, the erroneous assumptions of safety, in the absence of actual experimental data, are not only dangerous but have historically hampered serious scrutiny of potential vaccine harms. For example, in responding to numerous criticisms of their study Unexplained cases of sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination [8] Zinka et al. (2006) noted [18]:
“(ad 6) The main problem is that vaccination specialists have failed for decades to establish any tests or other criteria to find out if adverse events are linked to vaccinations or not. To our knowledge they did not even try hard—why?!”
“(1) A precise description of the mechanism leading to serious adverse events after hexavalent vaccination is not the task of forensic pathology. This would be the job of vaccination specialists, and actually this job should have been done before phase 1 and phase 2 studies in order to get valid data on the drug safety.”
Similarly, in 2006, Ottaviani et al. [4] in reporting a case of a 3-month-old female infant who died shortly after being given a hexavalent vaccination noted that:
“This case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby. Any case of sudden unexpected death occurring perinatally and in infancy, especially soon after a vaccination, should always undergo a full necropsy study according to our guidelines…The identification of a possible pathological basis of reflexogenic mechanisms in sudden, unexpected infant death necessarily requires examination of the brainstem nuclei and of the cardiac conduction system on serial sections.”
The senior author of this study, Professor Luigi Matturri is a member of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) Pathologists Panel for evaluation of SUD (sudden unexpected death) cases reported for hexavalent vaccines. Although a review by EMEA cited in the study concluded that the causes of death following hexavalent vaccination remained unexplained, the following was also emphasized:
“However, to the best of our knowledge, during the mentioned post-mortem investigations, little, if any, attention was paid to examination of the brainstem and the cardiac conduction systems on serial sections, nor was the possibility of a triggering role of the vaccine in the lethal outcome considered” [4].
It is thus obvious that the real reasons why causality is rarely established by scientific investigations of vaccine-related serious adverse reactions are:
  • it is assumed that vaccines cannot cause such reactions (as implied by the FDA workshop) and;
  • studies are not designed to detect them [19]
 We have also noted that too often clinical trials of new vaccines conducted by drug companies are fast tracked to licensure but
1) fail to use inactive placebos as controls;
2) include too few children in the age group that will be targeted for universal use;
3) have inadequate periods of time for follow up of safety and effectiveness;
4) only study healthy children without personal or family histories of vaccine reactions, autoimmunity, allergy, neurological disease or concurrent illness (although children with these medical histories are specifically targeted for vaccination post-licensure with very few medical contraindications listed to guide physicians);
5) fail to study large numbers of children given the experimental vaccine simultaneously with all other vaccines routinely administered simultaneously to children in that age group;
6) dismiss serious health problems, injuries and deaths occurring during the trial as not related to the experimental vaccine without adequate research evidence-based support;
7) use questionable surrogate endpoints to demonstrate vaccine effectiveness; and
8) lack adequate post-licensure follow-up [19-22].

The pushing of poorly tested drugs on most vulnerable populations (i.e., infants and children) can hardly be viewed as ethical. Unfortunately it is a frequent occurrence in medical practice when it comes to vaccination. To illustrate the consequences of such practices, in 2010 in Australia, there were a large numbers of serious adverse reactions from seasonal influenza vaccines routinely administered to children.
Subsequently, vaccination with certain influenza vaccines has been suspended in children under five years of age. In a series of Rapid Responses addressing this issue, published in British Medical Journal, titled “Adverse events following influenza vaccination in Australia-should we be surprised?” Peter Collignon (Director of Infectious Diseases & Microbiology at Australian National University) and colleagues from the Cochrane Collaboration review panel concluded [emphasis added] [23, 24]::
Collignon et al. [23]:
“Unlike most drugs, vaccines are used on a population basis triggered by public health policy. As such, evidence of their safety and efficacy needs to be extraordinarily rigorous and evaluation methods and data should be open to independent scrutiny. We need much better and larger studies on both safety and efficacy before we roll out influenza vaccine programs to all populations, especially to children who appear to have much higher rates of adverse reactions.
There is poor evidence on how well influenza vaccines prevent any influenza complications in children and other age groups. There is good evidence that influenza vaccines study reports cherry pick results and achieve spurious notoriety. Exposing human beings to uncertain effects is a risky business”
Collignon et al. [24]:
Vaccine policies must ensure they are doing more good than harm. Vaccine must cause far fewer serious adverse events compared to what the disease would have caused in the vaccine’s absence. Evidence suggests this is not the case with influenza. In Australia in 2009, during winter when young children (0-4 years) were first hit with the new H1N1 strain, the admission rate for influenza was 57 per 100,000 (8).
In the US, CDC says that influenza results in hospitalization for approximately 20 per 100,000 children aged 2 to 5 years (9), but vaccine-induced febrile convulsions resulting in hospitalization in US young children, likely occurred at a rate of 114 per 100,000 children vaccinated . According to the FDA, a “serious adverse event” is defined as hospitalization that results from a vaccine adverse event (10). Thus vaccinating young children without risk factors likely caused more serious adverse events than disease from the new “pandemic” itself. There is poor safety data available for other serious adverse events that might occur in young children in addition to febrile seizures (11).
Evidence from systematic reviews show evidence of data suppression of vaccine-associated harms to small children by some pharmaceutical companies (12). Other reports suggest that influenza vaccines put children at higher risk of future influenza infections compared to acquiring natural infection (original antigenic sin) (13). In older children, unexpected adverse events such as narcolepsy have been reported from at least 12 countries (14). In Canada previous immunisation with seasonal influenza vaccine doubled your risk of being infected with “swine flu” (15).
That the influenza vaccine is not an isolated case of poor scrutiny is evident from other literature on vaccines. Indeed, there is a growing number of reports of research misconduct, biased reporting, conflicts of interest, and outright fraudulent activity by pharmaceutical companies who produce the ever growing list of vaccines, bringing into question the accuracy of the vaccine manufacturers claims of safety and efficacy.
For example Merck & Co., Inc., the pharmaceutical company who produces the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine is currently accused in the U.S. of fraudulently lying about the efficacy of its mumps vaccine for the purpose of continuing to secure governmental contracts worth $ millions. In 2012, two former Merck virologists, a group of doctors, and direct payers filed two whistleblower law suits in the Pennsylvania federal court. Merck’s attorneys were unsuccessful in their attempts to block the case from going to trial with U.S. Federal District Judge C. Darnell Jones II, recently clearing the case for trial.
Judge Jones ruled the whistleblowers and direct purchasers produced enough evidence to establish that false statements could have helped give Merck a monopoly. A recent article from Pharma-based website fierce vaccines states [25]:
Merck has been the sole manufacturer with an FDA license to produce mumps vaccine since 1967, the news service points out, and the company has long touted a 95% efficacy rate for the shot. The drugmaker brought in $621 million on mumps vaccine sales last year, between its MMR2 vaccine and ProQuad, a pediatric combo jab.
But rather than using the “gold standard” approach and testing the vaccine against a wild-type mumps virus, Merck tested it against the attenuated virus strain that had created the vaccine in the 1960s–likely overstating the vaccine’s effectiveness, the whistleblowers claim, according to the judge’s memorandum.
And if Merck “fraudulently misled the government and omitted, concealed, and adulterated material information regarding the efficacy of its mumps vaccine” in violation of the False Claims Act, as they allege, it may have discouraged competition.
“This decision brings us one step closer to shining a light on Merck’s deceptive business practices so that new and more effective vaccines will ultimately be developed in the future,” Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi lawyer Kellie Lerner said in a statement.
Furthermore, with regard to the studies which allegedly demonstrably show no link between autism and vaccines, it has to be emphasized that once such studies undergo proper expert scrutiny, the “evidence” against the link becomes rather flimsy. In reviewing the published literature on measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine (139 studies), the respected Cochrane Collaboration review panel concluded that, “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate” [emphasis added] [26].
Moreover, none of the 31 studies that were included in the review met the Cochrane Collaboration’s methodological criteria. More specifically, referring to the 2001 Fombonne and Chakrabarti study [27] which was widely regarded by medical health authorities as most persuasive in disproving the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, the Cochrane Collaboration commented the following: “The number and possible impact of biases in this study was so high that interpretation of the results is impossible” [26].
Although the Cochrane Review on the safety of MMR concluded that there was no credible link between MMR vaccination and autism and Crohn’s disease, as pointed out earlier, the majority of the studies included in the evaluation were methodologically inadequate. The question thus is what “credible” evidence can be derived from inadequate and/or methodologically flawed studies?
It important to note that even those in the scientific community who are strong proponents of vaccinations have come to question the scientific legitimacy of “one-size fits all” vaccination practices [28]. For example, Poland (Editor in Chief of the journal Vaccine and co-author of “The age-old struggle against the antivaccinationists” [29]) and colleagues rightly ask whether “with the advances coming from the new biology of the 21st Century”, it is time to consider “how might new genetic and molecular biology information inform vaccinology practices of the future?” [28]. In light of this question Poland et al. conclude that “one-size fits all” approach for all vaccines and all persons should be abandoned.
According to Poland, this conclusion applies to both vaccine efficacy, as well as safety [28]. Regarding the latter, the widely held view that serious vaccine-related adverse reactions are rare needs revision, as current worldwide vaccination policies indeed operate on “one-size fits all” assumption. This assumption persists despite the fact that historically, vaccine trials have routinely excluded vulnerable individuals with a variety of pre-existing conditions (i.e., premature birth, personal or family history of developmental delay or neurologic disorders including epilepsy/seizures, hypersensitivity to vaccine constituents etc. [30-34]).
Because of such selection bias, the occurrence of serious adverse reactions resulting from vaccinations may be considerably underestimated. As mentioned previously, such an outcome should be of concern in view of documented evidence of permanent neurodevelopmental disabilities and deaths following vaccination in children with underlying genetic and other susceptibilities [2-4]. Poland et al.’s current data may thus have far broader implications for understanding vaccines, not only in terms of efficacy and the desired immune response, but also in terms of safety. Indeed, vulnerable populations will neither have the same antibody response nor the same level of tolerance to serious adverse reactions as non-vulnerable populations [28, 35].
For more please visit:

Herd Immunity: Can Infectious Diseases be Prevented by High-Vaccination Coverage?

Vaccine- or Hygiene-Preventable Diseases?
The prevalent view that vaccines are the sole cause of the disappearance of infectious diseases requires intellectual caution because it has been clearly demonstrated that factors such as clean water and improved sanitation, as well as better nutrition, availability of antibiotics, greater access to health care, and technological advances in maternal and neonatal medicine) have also played a major impact on infectious disease incidence [75].

What are in vaccines? Great links provided.

What are in vaccines?

- Gall (Comment posted:
The pharmaceutical companies and their scientists have kept this information from all of us for so many years, and not even doctors and nurses have been taught what are in vaccines, what they grow the viruses in, the contamination problems because vaccines are biological blood products that carry many viruses, bacteria, foreign proteins and DNA from the animals they are growing these viruses in, and this is why I am sharing with you some of my research and information that needs to come out, because vaccines are causing autoimmune and neurological diseases, and cancer. The many viruses that each animal carries, i.e., African Green Monkey (Vero Cells), cow / bovine products, Cocker Spaniel Cells, chicken, pig, sheep, insects products, mouse brain, and male and female aborted fetus cells, and more than one species are in some vaccines, that scientists are growing these viruses in, and that is why they are putting so many toxic chemicals in the vaccines to try to kill the viruses in these vaccines. I have links below, to verify this information. I know what has caused the HIV/AIDS and the Cancer Epidemics, and after reading this, I hope you will also. Many of our vaccines are grown in the African Green Monkey and they refer to it as Vero Cells, and they carry HIV, SIV, and the SV40 cancer virus, in which I have information in the links below.
I would like you to read all the information that I have put together, and please also look at the official medical links I have included in this email. Vaccines are listed as biological blood products on the FDA website, and they are contaminating our blood with other species, viruses, and DNA. Most people in the medical field are not taught what are in 
vaccines, what they grow the viruses in, the problems with contamination these manufacturers are having, and that they are contaminating our blood from animals, insects, and the tumors they are growing the viruses in for the production of vaccinations (I have the links regarding the viruses in tumors from the FDA Website). Please read this information, and if you have any questions or need more information, I will be happy to discuss this further. I have thousands of documents regarding what are really in vaccinations, and I have deep concerns for all people regarding the contaminating of our blood, and the neurological and autoimmune diseases being caused from vaccinations.
Introduction: The truth is, nobody knows how many vaccine victims there are in the world, how many of the 1 in 6 learning disabled children; or the 1 in 9 with asthma; or the 1 in 100 (actually, in Utah, it is one in 48) who develop autism; or the 1 in 450 who become diabetic, can trace their chronic inflammation, cancer, diseases, and disabilities back to vaccine reactions that have been dismissed by public health officials and doctors for the past century as just 'a coincidence. We now have the unhealthiest society we have ever seen. We have the highest vaccine schedules and one of the highest infant mortality rates in the world. It does not take a Rocket Scientist, once 
you learn how vaccines are made and what are in them. (There are so many books 
and articles that have been written over the past 200 years regarding all the 
deaths and diseases that vaccinations have caused, and they continue to cover it 
What will be the effect if you vaccinate? To become immune requires processes that do not occur on demand and happen in the outer levels of defense, bypassed by injections, so "immunizations" don't immunize. Rather, when foreign substances are injected, particularly what are in vaccinations, the immune system is derailed.
As a result, only in the vaccinated, new, more serious forms of the diseases can occur, such as atypical measles, where the rash moves in the wrong direction, and pneumonia, encephalitis or meningitis can result (see a medical dictionary.) Vaccination often even prevents immunity from developing, resulting in the repeated illnesses. The presence of antibodies does NOT show immunity, only past exposure (i.e., HIV).
Vaccines also increase susceptibility to unrelated, normally harmless viruses and bacteria (i.e. Meningococcal), and to other substances, like allergies, manifesting as eczema, hay fever, etc., but most notably as asthma. This occurs in about 30% of vaccinated children (only in 0-1% of those unvaccinated) and kills about 1% of asthma sufferers.
Other side effects from the vaccines, many of which are on the accompanying vaccine inserts, include: encephalitis or meningitis. Irritability, high-pitched screaming, inconsolable crying, sleepiness and convulsions, are all signs. Brain damage can be very mild (slightly lower IQ) to severe brain damage, recurring colds, tonsillitis, ear, respiratory, or other infections, bowel problems, celiac disease, autism, ADD, and other learning speech, and behavioral problems, paralysis, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and other neurological problems, mental illness, etc. Vaccines also cause autoimmune diseases such as lupus, diabetes, arthritis, and MS, organ damage or failure, blindness, deafness, and other disabilities, chronic fatigue syndrome, blood disorders, hormone imbalances, leukemia and other cancer (which can appear many years later), cot death,so-called "shaken baby" syndrome injuries, destruction of trans-placental immunity to pass to your own offspring, altered genes,infertility, weaknesses or defects in offspring, and other signs of a disoriented or disabled immune system.
Vaccines are a multi-billion dollar industry. Powerful interests fund medical education and research and enjoy support from the government, media, and other organizations. The result is that neither doctors nor lay people are taught about the ineffectiveness and adverse effects of vaccines, nor how they are made, and exactly what is coming through that needle. Few doctors do in-depth study of medical research on this subject.
Medical Doctors are also heavily pressured by the medical legal system and the overwhelming authorities,which can push for de-registration, and make them lose their license, of a doctor who advises against vaccinations. In addition, there are high bonuses and other financial incentives to vaccinate for the doctors who give them. Many conforming doctors admit to not vaccinating their own children.
What really caused the decline in the diseases? The repeated crediting of this to vaccines does not make it true. The government’s own statistics show that even smallpox and polio vaccinations only came after the dramatic decline in the diseases. It was attributed to better nutrition, cleaner water, sanitation, and other factors. Indeed this trend has reversed with increased vaccination, causing new more deadly and devastating diseases to appear like cancer, autoimmune, and neurological diseases.
The information I am giving you is from official government medical websites, that are supposed to oversee vaccinations and their research. My concern is in this subject of vaccinations, that no one is bringing out that these vaccinations are biological blood products according to the FDA and World Health Organization, and then there are the type of cells they grow the vaccines in which they are continuous cell and immortal cell lines, which means they are tumorigenic and oncogenetic, and the cross species transfer of infectious particles from what they are growing the viruses in, for the 
production of these vaccines. They are growing these viruses in the African Green Monkey and other animals, insects, tumors, etc. They are contaminating our blood, and that upsets me just as much as all the toxic chemicals they are using.
Here are the Official Medical Sites
Please review this information, because this is what you are not being told regarding 
vaccinations with information from the CDC, FDA, and World Health Organization (WHO) Websites. Ingredients in Vaccines by the CDC: Controversial products used to make vaccines: African Green Monkey (Vero) cells, aluminum, cow products, Cocker Spaniel cells, formaldehyde, human fetal lung tissue cells, insect products, and mouse brains. Doctors, Nurses, and Politicians are not trained on how the pharmaceutical industries make and they do not know what are what are in vaccines.
and also (Be sure to scroll down and read II. GLOSSARY AND DETAILS FOR INGREDIENTS of what are in the vaccines and details about the ingredients).
This is FDA information regarding what type of cells are used in vaccines. Please do a search for Immortal Cell Lines and Continuous Cell Lines. This is from the FDA Briefing Document Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting, September 19, 2012, Cell Lines Derived from Human Tumors for Vaccine Manufacture. Please realize that the pharmaceutical companies that make a fortune from cancer treatments are using cell lines from both human and animals tumors. That is why I ask you to please do research on Immortal and Continuous Cell Lines. Do NOT allow these insane people making the vaccines give any more of us CANCER, AUTOIMMUNE AND NEUROLOGICAL DISEASES! We need to put a stop to this! 
and also 
This is the Transcripts of the Meeting of The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) September 19, 2012. Consideration of the Appropriateness of Cell Lines Derived from Human Tumors for Vaccine Manufacture.
As you can see, the FDA took down their webcast, but I watched the entire thing, and I was physically sick after watching it. That is why I downloaded the transcripts.
Current Manufacturer Vaccine Inserts from the John Hopkins Hospital - Please read them all the way through. Please note that on 13.1 on all vaccine inserts, it states the vaccine has not been tested or evaluated for Carcinogenesis (to create cancer), Mutagenesis (to mutate our genes and cause autoimmune diseases and cancer), Impairment of Fertility, as in to sterilize the future generations. This brings up a page where you can click on each vaccine, and read and print the manufacturer vaccine insert that is not given to people at the time of vaccination. People getting vaccinated get a Vaccine Information Statement (VIS), if that, which is not the manufacturer insert, so they can make an informed choice.
China enters the Global Vaccine Market. This is from the World Health Organization. This is where our vaccines are going to be coming from now and also India and other countries.
You know how everyone keeps denying autism? Well here it is in this Vaccine Insert. FDA Admits Autism, page 11, on vaccine insert - Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to 
reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine.
CDC Article regarding Adventitious Agents and Vaccines 
This is a very interesting article by the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding the SV40 cancer virus in vaccinations. Once these animal viruses and foreign proteins and blood products from the vaccinations are injected into us, it is passed on from one generation to another.
This CONFIDENTIAL GSK DOCUMENT by a corrupt vaccine industry listing all the adverse events they found in their studies and their lack of and on going studies!!!! This is a huge file, 1,271 pages long. This is absolutely mind blowing on how much I have read so far, and they still state it is safe. This is a must read. Please download this for your file. Someone was able to get a hold of this, and it is official.
Right from The National Library of Medicine National Institute of Health - PubMed is a Federal Government Medical Website, admitting the polio vaccine in India paralyzed 47,500 children, and MANY DIED! Furthermore, while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional 
to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. DID YOU GET THAT? THE ORAL POLIO 
VACCINE THEY GAVE TO THE CHILDREN IN INDIA PARALYZED 47,500 of THEM AND IT WAS NOT INVESTIGATED. Sound familiar? Like what they are doing here in the 
There are many articles regarding this subject that you may find on the Internet regarding a mutation that so many people have. About 45 percent or more of people have this genetic trait, what is referred to as a MTHFR defect. MTHFR is a common 
genetic variant that causes a key enzyme in the body to function at lower than normal rate. This can lead to a variety of medical problems, when people with MTHFR are exposed to more toxins than their bodies can handle. There are over 50 known MTHFR variants, but the two prime variants are called 677 and 1298, the numbers refer to their location on the gene. The routine lab test for MTHFR variant only reports on 677 and 1298 as these are the most studied. vaccines can cause serious damage in people with genetic "defects" that impair the body's ability to neutralize and eliminate toxins. One such "defect" involves genetic mutations to the MTHFR C677T enzyme, which is directly responsible for fueling the methylation cycle.
Put more simply, this genetic mutation impairs the ability of those who have it to detoxify 
environmental stressors like chemicals in the air and water, food additives, bacteria, pharmaceutical drugs and, yes, the adjuvant's and other chemical additives used in nearly every vaccine. What this means for those with this mutation is that their bodies will continue to accumulate toxins over time, leading to increasingly serious chronic health problems as a result of this unprecedented vaccine violence.
Maurice Hilleman, one of the top scientists from Merck and who made the vaccines, admitted that the monkeys they brought over here from Africa to grow the viruses in to make vaccinations, that some were infected with the HIV virus and some were infected 
with the SV40 Cancer Virus, which causes soft tissue cancers and is spread from one generation to the next. Soft Tissue cancers are breast, brain, and prostrate cancers. Also, Leukemia virus came from vaccines from the animals they are growing the viruses in. That is why you do not mix the blood of animals with humans, because it is giving the people new diseases. Eating meat is one thing, but injecting the biological blood of animals, that have foreign DNA, proteins, and viruses that they carry, is totally insane in my opinion. Anyway, Maurice Hilleman warned and notified Merck of this, and they just 
ignored him, and they continued to contaminate the blood of people all over the 
They kept this recording from Maurice Hilleman from public information, but it was uncovered. He worked for Merck and was their top scientist and made 40 of their vaccines. I hope you have time to watch. When he says the greens came in, he is talking about the African Green Monkey, which they are still using to grow viruses in to produce vaccines. Please click on this and watch this. Maurice Hilleman made 40 different vaccines for Merck. Please click on this link and listen to this a couple of times.
The reasons listed above is why there should never be forced vaccination any where. To many people, both young and old, it could be a death sentence or destroy the rest of their life with new diseases caused from the vaccines. These people making the vaccines should be in prison, as far as I am concerned, because of what are in the vaccines. The way vaccinations are made, will be causing early deaths in the future, and these pharmaceutical industries are allowed to continue to experiment on us and use us as human guinea pigs. Our government does not have the best reputation for experimenting on people and giving false information, if you look at past history. I hope you earnestly read this information, and please start doing your own research. It is important that you do your own research, from those who are overseeing the manufacturing of these vaccines, and not doctors paid by the pharmaceutical industry or that have strong investments ties, that have nothing to do with manufacturing. Research the manufacturer, the FDA, and the World Health Organization, and also other countries who are doing testing on the vaccines. You and your own family's health and life are dependent on this.